当前位置:首页 > 单片机 > C语言与CPP编程
[导读]来自公众号:大胖聊编程作者:大胖ASan,即AddressSanitizer,是一个适用于c/c程序的动态内存错误检测器,它由一个编译器检测模块(LLVMpass)和一个替换malloc函数的运行时库组成,在性能及检测内存错误方面都优于Valgrind,你值得拥有。一适用平台在L...

来自公众号:大胖聊编程

作者:大胖

ASan,即Address Sanitizer,是一个适用于c/c 程序的动态内存错误检测器,它由一个编译器检测模块(LLVM pass)和一个替换malloc函数的运行时库组成,在性能及检测内存错误方面都优于Valgrind,你值得拥有。
一适用平台在LLVM3.1版之后,ASan就是其的一个组成部分,所以所有适用LLVM的平台,且llvm版本大于3.1的,都可以适用ASan来检查c/c 内存错误。对于gcc,则是4.8版本之后才加入ASan,但是ASan的完整功能则是要gcc版本在4.9.2以上。


二强大功能ASan作为编译器内置功能,支持检测各种内存错误:
  • 缓冲区溢出 
    ① 堆内存溢出
    ② 栈上内存溢出
    ③ 全局区缓存溢出
  • 悬空指针(引用)
    ① 使用释放后的堆上内存
    ② 使用返回的栈上内存
    ③ 使用退出作用域的变量
  • 非法释放
    ① 重复释放
    ② 无效释放
  • 内存泄漏
  • 初始化顺序导致的问题
ASan和Valgrind对比如下图:


三如何使用
  1. 使用ASan时,只需gcc选项加上-fsanitize=address选项;
  2. 如果想要在使用asan的时候获取更好的性能,可以加上O1或者更高的编译优化选项;
  3. 想要在错误信息中让栈追溯信息更友好,可以加上-fno-omit-frame-pointer选项。
  4. 本文针对linux x86-64平台,gcc编译器环境实验。

本文实验环境:
[root@yglocal ~]# lsb_release -aLSB Version: :core-4.1-amd64:core-4.1-noarchDistributor ID: CentOSDescription: CentOS Linux release 8.1.1911 (Core) Release: 8.1.1911Codename: Core[root@yglocal ~]# uname -r4.18.0-147.el8.x86_64[root@yglocal ~]# gcc --versiongcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20190507 (Red Hat 8.3.1-4)Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NOwarranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
在centos上使用ASan,编译会报如下错误(gcc 4.8.5):

[root@localhost test]# gcc -g -O2 -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer hello.c /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libasan.so.0.0.0collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

安装libasan即可:
[root@localhost test]# yum install libasan

注:ubuntu x86-64系统只需gcc版本高于4.8即可;但是在rhel/centos上使用ASan功能,除了gcc版本大于4.8之外,还需要安装libasan。
下面针对内存的几种c/c 常见内存错误,编写例子,看下ASan的检测输出情况:

1
堆缓冲区溢出

测试代码:
[root@yglocal asan_test]# vi heap_ovf_test.c
#include #include #include

int main(){ char *heap_buf = (char*)malloc(32*sizeof(char)); memcpy(heap_buf 30, "overflow", 8); //在heap_buf的第30个字节开始,拷贝8个字符
free(heap_buf);
return 0;}
编译并运行:

[root@yglocal asan_test]# gcc -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer -o heap_ovf_test heap_ovf_test.c [root@yglocal asan_test]# ./heap_ovf_test ===================================================================40602==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x603000000030 at pc 0x7f3de8f91a1d bp 0x7ffd4b4ebb60 sp 0x7ffd4b4eb308WRITE of size 8 at 0x603000000030 thread T0 #0 0x7f3de8f91a1c (/lib64/libasan.so.5 0x40a1c) #1 0x400845 in main (/root/asan_test/heap_ovf_test 0x400845) #2 0x7f3de8bb1872 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6 0x23872) #3 0x40075d in _start (/root/asan_test/heap_ovf_test 0x40075d)
0x603000000030 is located 0 bytes to the right of 32-byte region [0x603000000010,0x603000000030)allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x7f3de9040ba8 in __interceptor_malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5 0xefba8) #1 0x400827 in main (/root/asan_test/heap_ovf_test 0x400827) #2 0x7f3de8bb1872 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6 0x23872)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow (/lib64/libasan.so.5 0x40a1c) Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x0c067fff7fb0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0c067fff7fc0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0c067fff7fd0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0c067fff7fe0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0c067fff7ff0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00=>0x0c067fff8000: fa fa 00 00 00 00[fa]fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 0x0c067fff8010: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 0x0c067fff8020: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 0x0c067fff8030: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 0x0c067fff8040: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 0x0c067fff8050: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa faShadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb==40602==ABORTING[root@yglocal asan_test]#
可以看到asan报错:==40602==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x603000000030 at xxxx,下面也列出了发生heap-buffer-overflow时的调用链及heap buffer在哪里申请的。


2
栈缓冲区溢出

测试代码:
[root@yglocal asan_test]# vi stack_ovf_test.c
#include #include
int main(){ char stack_buf[4] = {0}; strcpy(stack_buf, "1234");
return 0;}
编译并运行:

[root@yglocal asan_test]# ./stack_ovf_test ===================================================================38634==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffcf3d8b8d4 at pc 0x7f8714bbaa1d bp 0x7ffcf3d8b8a0 sp 0x7ffcf3d8b048WRITE of size 5 at 0x7ffcf3d8b8d4 thread T0 #0 0x7f8714bbaa1c (/lib64/libasan.so.5 0x40a1c) #1 0x400949 in main (/root/asan_test/stack_ovf_test 0x400949) #2 0x7f87147da872 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6 0x23872) #3 0x4007cd in _start (/root/asan_test/stack_ovf_test 0x4007cd)
Address 0x7ffcf3d8b8d4 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 36 in frame #0 0x400895 in main (/root/asan_test/stack_ovf_test 0x400895)
This frame has 1 object(s): [32, 36) 'stack_buf' <== Memory access at offset 36 overflows this variableHINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism or swapcontext (longjmp and C exceptions *are* supported)SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow (/lib64/libasan.so.5 0x40a1c) Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x10001e7a96c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x10001e7a96d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x10001e7a96e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x10001e7a96f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x10001e7a9700: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00=>0x10001e7a9710: 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1[04]f2 f2 f2 f3 f3 0x10001e7a9720: f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x10001e7a9730: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x10001e7a9740: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x10001e7a9750: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x10001e7a9760: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00......

可以看到asan报错:==38634==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffcf3d8b8d4 at xxx,发生stack buffer overflow时函数的调用链信息。

3
使用悬空指针

测试代码:
[root@yglocal asan_test]# vi dangling_pointer_test.c
#include #include #include
int main(){ char *p = (char*)malloc(32*sizeof(char)); free(p);
int a = p[1];
return 0;}编译并运行:
[root@yglocal asan_test]# gcc -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer -o dangling_pointer_test dangling_pointer_test.c [root@yglocal asan_test]# ./dangling_pointer_test ===================================================================83532==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x603000000011 at pc 0x0000004007c4 bp 0x7ffd7f562760 sp 0x7ffd7f562750READ of size 1 at 0x603000000011 thread T0 #0 0x4007c3 in main (/root/asan_test/dangling_pointer_test 0x4007c3) #1 0x7f56196cd872 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6 0x23872) #2 0x4006ad in _start (/root/asan_test/dangling_pointer_test 0x4006ad)
0x603000000011 is located 1 bytes inside of 32-byte region [0x603000000010,0x603000000030)freed by thread T0 here: #0 0x7f5619b5c7e0 in __interceptor_free (/lib64/libasan.so.5 0xef7e0) #1 0x400787 in main (/root/asan_test/dangling_pointer_test 0x400787) #2 0x7f56196cd872 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6 0x23872)
previously allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x7f5619b5cba8 in __interceptor_malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5 0xefba8) #1 0x400777 in main (/root/asan_test/dangling_pointer_test 0x400777) #2 0x7f56196cd872 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6 0x23872)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free (/root/asan_test/dangling_pointer_test 0x4007c3) in mainShadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x0c067fff7fb0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0c067fff7fc0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0c067fff7fd0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0c067fff7fe0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0c067fff7ff0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00=>0x0c067fff8000: fa fa[fd]fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 0x0c067fff8010: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 0x0c067fff8020: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 0x0c067fff8030: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 0x0c067fff8040: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 0x0c067fff8050: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa faShadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):......
4
使用栈上返回的变量

[root@yglocal asan_test]# vi use-after-return.c
#include #include #include int *ptr;void get_pointer(){ int local[10]; ptr =
本站声明: 本文章由作者或相关机构授权发布,目的在于传递更多信息,并不代表本站赞同其观点,本站亦不保证或承诺内容真实性等。需要转载请联系该专栏作者,如若文章内容侵犯您的权益,请及时联系本站删除( 邮箱:macysun@21ic.com )。
换一批
延伸阅读

在系列底层技术文章中,我们先后深入探讨过系统调用实现原理、GDB调试底层逻辑、Linux最大并发数等核心系统主题,而内存交换机制是Linux虚拟内存体系中最容易被普通开发者忽略,却直接决定系统在高内存压力下稳定性的核心机...

关键字: Linux内存 内存

在C语言的标准库中,原生字符串始终以'\0'作为结束标记,这种以字符数组为基础的实现方式存在天生的局限性:开发者很难在运行时动态调整字符串的长度,一旦超出预先分配的固定数组大小,就会触发缓冲区溢出的安全风险。在实际开发中...

关键字: 字符串 内存

很多节点上线头几天一切正常,跑到一两个月后才开始变慢、重启或误报内存不足。边缘计算里的内存风险,常见的不是一次性爆掉,而是碎片和小泄漏长时间叠加后把系统推到边界。

关键字: 边缘计算 内存 碎片

2026年的PC市场,正经历着一场从硬件到软件的全面涨价潮。

关键字: PC 内存 微软 Windows

加利福尼亚州圣何塞2026年8月7日 /美通社/ -- 美国硅谷当地时间8月5日,FMS 2026期间,江波龙首席科学家陈健博士发表《Intelligence at the Edge: Powered by the St...

关键字: FOUNDRY FM AI 内存

“2031年之前中国别想翻盘!”韩国媒体近日借一份市场报告,向全球发出充满火药味的宣示

关键字: 内存 存储 存储芯片

横琴2026年7月31日 /美通社/ -- 澜起科技今日宣布,率先在业界试产CXL® 3.2内存扩展控制器(MXC)芯片。该产品面向人工智能、云计算、数据中心等场景的内存扩展与资源池化需求,旨在通过CXL技术助力...

关键字: 内存 控制器 MX DDR

全新 MRCD 与 MDB 设计提供 12800 MT/s 高速,注入强劲 AI 算力动能 深圳2026年7月30日 /美通社/ -- 全球工业存储及嵌入式外设领导品牌宜鼎国际(Innodi...

关键字: DDR 内存 带宽 AI

内存泄露是C/C++等手动内存管理语言开发中最常见也最头疼的问题之一:程序运行时间越长,占用内存越来越多,最终会把系统内存耗尽,导致程序崩溃或者系统卡死,甚至影响服务器上其他服务的正常运行。很多开发者遇到内存泄露问题,往...

关键字: 内存泄露 内存

虚拟内存是现代操作系统最核心的设计之一,它彻底改变了程序对物理内存的访问方式,让每个进程都拥有了独立、连续的超大地址空间,既实现了进程间的内存隔离,也解决了物理内存容量不足的问题。Linux作为目前应用最广泛的服务器操作...

关键字: 内存 虚拟内存
关闭